Lets examine portuguese case: they 
engaged in forced conversions and aggression against everyone including 
even the nasranis. They tried their maximum to convert as many people as
 possible. Eventually even the christians/nasranis here could not 
tolerate them. And they got ejected by the dutch.
British
 case.....they tried conversions directly till 1857, when missionary 
excesses led Hindus and Muslims to unite against them.
Britishers
 may have been highly organized. But they were no mongols or mughals. If
 the hindus and muslims of the subcontinent sneezed together, the 
british would have landed in arabia. British colonials- around 80,000 to
 2 lakh of them controlled the Indian subcontinent, through their sheer 
organisation skills and by recruiting locals. They could not risk 
letting missionaries scot free, as they
understood the risk of hindu muslim unity.
 
No comments:
Post a Comment