Lets examine portuguese case: they
engaged in forced conversions and aggression against everyone including
even the nasranis. They tried their maximum to convert as many people as
possible. Eventually even the christians/nasranis here could not
tolerate them. And they got ejected by the dutch.
British
case.....they tried conversions directly till 1857, when missionary
excesses led Hindus and Muslims to unite against them.
Britishers
may have been highly organized. But they were no mongols or mughals. If
the hindus and muslims of the subcontinent sneezed together, the
british would have landed in arabia. British colonials- around 80,000 to
2 lakh of them controlled the Indian subcontinent, through their sheer
organisation skills and by recruiting locals. They could not risk
letting missionaries scot free, as they
understood the risk of hindu muslim unity.
No comments:
Post a Comment